Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Classify these supplied objects: an official code section in HTML; a PDF of a reported opinion; a witness's deposition transcript; a professor's journal article explaining the opinion. State which delivery methods change the source's legal category.
The HTML item is a statute/code provision; the PDF is a judicial opinion; the deposition is litigation-record testimony; and the article is a secondary source. HTML and PDF are delivery formats and do not change the underlying legal category. The source-specific citation system follows the item being cited. Access information can supplement it, but electronic delivery does not make all four items generic websites.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Rewrite the chapter's Brown proposition using a citation sentence and then an embedded reference. Explain why the case-name spelling differs.
Citation sentence: The Court rejected separate educational facilities in public education as inherently unequal. Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 495 (1954). Embedded reference: In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 495 (1954), the Court reached that conclusion. The textual-name convention spells out Board and Education; the citation-sentence name uses the permitted citation abbreviations. Both must describe the same inspected passage.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. A witness declaration says only that the witness mailed a letter. A draft cites it for “The notice statute requires mailing within ten days.” Identify the support problem and the missing source type.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
The declaration can support that the witness says mailing occurred. It does not establish the statute's deadline or command. Obtain the applicable statutory text and version, then cite its precise provision for the legal requirement. Keep the declaration for the attributed factual statement. Correct punctuation around a declaration cannot turn witness evidence into statutory authority.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. A sentence compares Rule A and Rule B, each supplied in a different fictional statute. Describe where to place each citation so the reader can identify support without guessing.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
Place each citation immediately after the proposition about its own rule, using a citation clause or separate sentences as clarity requires. If the comparison is a single supported analytical proposition, a carefully constructed comparison citation can identify both sources and their differing rules. Do not place a single unexplained citation at the end and require the reader to guess which source supplies which command.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
A case name appears in ordinary prose as Brown v. Bd. of Educ. Revise it under the textual-name convention taught here. Leave the separate citation sentence form available for comparison.
In ordinary prose use Brown v. Board of Education. For a citation sentence retain Brown v. Bd. of Educ., followed by the remaining identifying fields. The distinction concerns placement and name abbreviation, not two different cases. Preserve italics for the case name in both settings. An abbreviated short name such as Brown can be appropriate after clear introduction in the same discussion.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. A complaint alleges a payment occurred. The draft says, “The court found that the payment occurred,” citing the complaint. Explain the correction even if the complaint's citation is perfectly formatted.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
Rewrite the statement as an allegation: The complaint alleges that the payment occurred. Cite the relevant complaint paragraph. Alternatively, locate an actual finding or other evidence supporting the stronger sentence before retaining it. A pleading's perfectly formatted citation still identifies a pleading. Its allegations are not automatically judicial findings, and citation editing should expose rather than conceal that difference.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Choose the capitalization for a see signal at the beginning of a citation sentence and inside a citation clause. State the punctuation that distinguishes the two placements.
Begin a citation sentence with See and end the sentence with a period. Inside a citation clause use see, ordinarily set off by commas with the surrounding prose. A clause's final punctuation depends on whether it ends the whole sentence. Capitalization follows placement, while the signal's substantive meaning remains the same inference relationship.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Your instructor requires law-review footnotes. Explain what this handbook supplies and what additional instructions you must obtain before representing the document as fully compliant.
The handbook supplies a practitioner foundation and a limited academic comparison. Obtain the instructor's actual note-format requirements, required manual/edition, and any assignment-specific conventions. Check typeface, footnotes, source forms, and cross-reference expectations against those instructions. Do not label the work fully law-review compliant merely because a practitioner citation is recognizable or because you added footnote numbers.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. A paragraph cites one opinion at its end after discussing a statute, disputed testimony, and an inference. Give a three-step repair plan that addresses substance as well as placement.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
First separate the paragraph's statutory proposition, factual testimony, and inference. Second locate and inspect each actual source and the corresponding passage, correcting attribution and unsupported claims. Third place source-specific citations near their propositions and choose signals matching direct support or inference. A final paragraph-level opinion citation cannot substitute for those distinct sources. Recheck the paragraph after editing so its structure remains clear.
- Previous
- Chapter 1 answers