Skip to content

Answer key

Chapter 4 answers

  1. Solution 4.1

    CC-04-01← Return to Exercise 4.1
    Show the exercise

    Convert the full Anderson model to a named short citation at 248, assuming the full citation already appears nearby and no other Anderson case is cited.

    Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248. The distinctive name, volume, reporter, and at-pinpoint identify the source already fully cited nearby. The exercise supplies the needed contextual conditions and no competing Anderson case. If the paragraph later moves or another similarly named case enters the document, reconsider whether more identifying information is needed.

  2. Solution 4.2

    CC-04-02← Return to Exercise 4.2
    Show the exercise

    Format pinpoint ranges for pages 1240 through 1241 and 199 through 201. Explain why the second range needs more digits.

    Use 1240-41 and 199-201 under the taught range convention. In the first range the omitted repeated leading digits remain recoverable. Across the hundreds boundary in the second, retaining 201 prevents confusion about the end page. This is a locator convention, not permission to cite a broad range that was not actually inspected. The source card should preserve the exact pages supporting the sentence.

  3. Solution 4.3

    CC-04-03← Return to Exercise 4.3
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. Repair at ¶ 8 and at § 12(a)(2)(B). Preserve the supplied subdivision information.

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    Use ¶ 8 and § 12(a)(2)(B), without at before those subdivision symbols. Keep every supplied subsection parenthesis and its order. The paragraph and section markers identify different subdivision types, while at belongs to the relevant page-pinpoint pattern. Removing a nested subsection would make the citation less precise and could point to a different command.

  4. Solution 4.4

    CC-04-04← Return to Exercise 4.4
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. Using the agency sentence supplied in this chapter, explain why changing may to [must] is not an acceptable quotation repair.

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    Changing may to [must] changes discretionary wording into mandatory wording. Brackets disclose a changed word but do not make the substantive alteration faithful. Preserve may or paraphrase the source accurately. If another source establishes a mandatory requirement, cite it separately after inspection. Quotation tools permit transparent editing; they do not authorize changing the source's legal meaning.

  5. Solution 4.5

    CC-04-05← Return to Exercise 4.5
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. The original sentence is “We hold that the permit remains valid.” Quote only “the permit remains valid” as a sentence, disclosing the change in capitalization.

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    “[T]he permit remains valid.” The bracket discloses the capitalization change from the supplied sentence's internal the to a sentence-opening The. The excerpt must not be presented in a context that changes the original conclusion. Explain any other required omission treatment under the receiving convention. No invented case citation should be attached to these fictional words.

  6. Solution 4.6

    CC-04-06← Return to Exercise 4.6
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. A note numbered 7 appears on source page 52. Format a page-and-footnote pinpoint, then explain what n.7 without the page would fail to identify.

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    52 n.7. The page identifies the location of the footnote within the source, and n.7 identifies the numbered note there. n.7 alone can be insufficient where a source or collection has repeated numbering or the reader needs a page locator. Use the source-specific citation with this pinpoint rather than presenting the locator as a complete source identity.

  7. Solution 4.7

    CC-04-07← Return to Exercise 4.7
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. The complete supplied passage is: “The board received the written request on Monday. The clerk entered the request in the public register on Tuesday. The board reviewed the request at its Friday meeting and directed the clerk to send a response. The minutes record that decision but do not establish when the clerk mailed the response or when the applicant received it at her office.” Describe the passage's block-quotation layout, outer quotation marks, and following citation placement under this chapter's baseline. The packet supplies no external source metadata; do not invent any.

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    Set the supplied passage off as a block because it exceeds fifty words. Use the taught single spacing and left/right indentation, omit outer quotation marks, and preserve punctuation and any quotation marks internal to the original. A following citation would use the ordinary left margin outside the block. This packet supplies only the fictional passage, so do not fabricate a case, date, reporter, or pinpoint. Check the receiving document's actual layout rule when applying the pattern to a real source.

  8. Solution 4.8

    CC-04-08← Return to Exercise 4.8
    Show the exercise

    Explain the handbook's default approach to omission disclosure and identify the contradiction recorded in Indigo R8.2.6. Distinguish this editorial choice from a verified receiving-court rule.

    The house default expressly discloses omitted internal citations or footnotes where appropriate. Indigo R8.2.4 and R8.3.6 call for disclosure, while R8.2.6 says not to indicate such omissions. The editorial record preserves that contradiction and labels its chosen default as editorial, not a verified rule of every court. Receiving instructions and edition-specific quotation rules can require another treatment.

  9. Solution 4.9

    CC-04-09← Return to Exercise 4.9
    Show the exercise

    Fictional training example — not legal authority. You remove a nested source citation, change capitalization for readability, and then omit a substantive condition. Explain why a readability-modification parenthetical alone cannot justify all three operations.

    Fictional training example — not legal authority.

    Removing nested citation material and adjusting capitalization for readability may fall within a specifically authorized modification convention. Omitting a substantive condition is a different problem: it can misrepresent the source's meaning. Restore the condition or create a faithful, properly disclosed excerpt. A “citation modified” parenthetical cannot excuse substantive distortion, and its scope must be read from the actual applicable instruction.

Previous
Chapter 3 answers