Answer key
Chapter 19 answers
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. Fiction Scholarship Journal requires case names in roman type in citation footnotes and italics in narrative text. It requests small capitals for journal names. An editor italicizes every case name and types journal names in ordinary full capitals. Identify the two corrections and explain why the source metadata should remain unchanged.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
Under the supplied fictional journal instruction, use roman case names in citation footnotes and italics for case names in narrative prose. Apply a genuine small-capitals character style to journal names instead of typing ordinary full-capital text. These are presentation changes: the case name, journal title, volume, first page, pinpoint, and year remain the same verified metadata. A style conversion should not invent or alter bibliographic facts. The answer applies only the supplied receiving instruction; it does not impose that fictional instruction on every publication.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. Mara Vale's Open Research Records appears in volume 12 Fiction Scholarship Journal, first page 100, year 2025. Use the supplied abbreviation Fiction Scholarship J. Page 112 describes requirements at two journals. Build a full citation and a sentence accurately stating that proposition.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
Mara Vale, Open Research Records, 12 Fiction Scholarship J. 100, 112 (2025). An accurate sentence is: Vale reports replication-material requirements at two surveyed journals. The supplied passage supports a limited report about two journals, not a rule applying to every court and not an empirical finding about accuracy. First page 100 identifies the article; page 112 identifies the supporting passage. Apply any supplied journal-name character style separately from the citation's underlying text. All authority metadata in this exercise is fictional.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. Note 7 contains the full Vale article citation from CC-19-02. Note 8 cites another author. Return to Vale at page 115, which recommends repositories. Use an eligible secondary-source return reference and explain why id. would misidentify the source.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
Vale, supra note 7, at 115. The full citation in note 7 identifies the eligible secondary source, and 115 locates its recommendation. A more descriptive short title is also acceptable if necessary to distinguish another Vale work. An id. immediately following the intervening author's source would point to that intervening source, not Vale. Describe page 115 as a recommendation rather than measured evidence. The note number must remain tied to the actual full citation after revision.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. The full Vale citation moves from note 7 to note 10 after a new section is inserted. A later note still reads “Vale, supra note 7, at 115.” State the repair and a method of preventing recurrence without assuming that automatically generated fields are infallible.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
Repair the return reference to Vale, supra note 10, at 115, after confirming that note 10 now contains the full citation to the intended work. Use managed footnote numbering and cross-reference fields or stable source identifiers during editing. Refresh fields after the section moves, then test the actual destinations in the final document. Automation reduces manual renumbering but cannot correct a field originally linked to the wrong note or a reference broken during export.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. A 2024 working paper supports a claim at page 18. Its 2025 published version has pages 200–240, but you have read only the abstract. May you replace the working-paper citation with “at 218”? Identify the additional work needed.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
No. The number 218 cannot be inferred by adding 200 to a working-paper page or by reading an abstract. Obtain the published article, locate the actual supporting passage, compare its wording and qualifications with the working paper, and verify its publication metadata and pinpoint. If the published version removed or changed the passage, retain the working-paper citation for the historical proposition or revise the claim. A version substitution requires substantive checking as well as new formatting.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. An article quotes a judicial sentence and criticizes it. You have read the article but not the decision. Draft an attribution that truthfully identifies what you inspected; then explain what you must obtain before making a direct claim about the court's reasoning.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
An acceptable attribution is: In discussing the decision, the article quotes a judicial sentence and criticizes its reasoning. Cite the article at the inspected passage. This truthfully identifies the material actually read. Before stating directly what the court held or how it reasoned, obtain the opinion, locate the sentence, identify whether it belongs to the court, a separate opinion, or a quoted submission, and read the necessary context. Do not convert an indirect quotation into a claim of firsthand verification.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. A paragraph says, “Three courts adopted the rule, 80 percent of litigants understood it, and the rule should be expanded.” Source A identifies three decisions; Source B reports a survey percentage; the expansion recommendation is yours. Describe an arrangement of sentences and notes that keeps these claims distinguishable.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
Use separate sentences or clearly separated clauses for the three-decision report, the survey result, and the author's recommendation. Attach Source A to the report about the decisions and Source B to the survey statement, preserving the survey's population, measure, and qualifications. Present expansion as the writer's proposed conclusion and explain its reasoning. A single undifferentiated footnote risks suggesting that all sources support every part of the original sentence. Appropriate arrangements can vary if the source-to-claim relationships remain clear.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Use the real annotated model in this chapter. Identify why Submissions should not receive a law-review volume, how its named section functions as a locator, and what the last-visited date does and does not establish.
Submissions is the title of an institutional webpage, not a paginated law-review article, so an invented volume and first page would misclassify it. The named Scholarly Integrity section directs the reader to the particular policy on that page. The last-visited date records when this changing page was inspected. It does not establish the policy's original adoption date, guarantee that the page remains unchanged, or prove compliance by a particular submission. The direct URL and accurate source type provide a retrievable citation.
Show the exerciseHide the exercise
Fictional training example — not legal authority. A final PDF preserves every word but drops small capitals and leaves two “infra Section IV” references pointing to a section renamed V. Write a release-editing note identifying the necessary repairs and the distinction between textual completeness and correct presentation.
Fictional training example — not legal authority.
The release note should request restoration of the required small-capitals styles and correction or refresh of both references to the section now numbered V, followed by a check that V actually contains the promised discussion. Preserving every word proves only textual completeness. Correct publication requires the intended character styles, accurate section numbering, and working destinations in the exported PDF. Reinspect the affected pages after the repairs rather than assuming that a corrected source document guarantees a corrected export.
- Previous
- Chapter 18 answers